No child should go hungry
Responding to the Russian Famine in the 1920s
1921 summer the devastating famine in Russia became the overriding international emergency, and as a result the Save the Children's mission was changed to "an international effort to preserve child life wherever it is menaced by conditions of economic hardship and distress". After seven years of revolution, international and civil war, with the loss of twenty-five-million lives and creation of thousands of refugees, Russia had been hit by harvest failure, greatly exacerbated if not directly caused by the new regime's domestic policy. Between fifteen and twenty-million people were facing starvation.
Meanwhile the slowing British economy prompted the press to question donating funds for Russian children at all when there was growing need at home. It was clear that for a Russian appeal to be successful in Britain the public once again needed to be persuaded that there was a genuine and desperate case for aid. Some papers were sympathetic, but several criticised Save the Children and challenged the accuracy of famine reports.
"The magnitude of the famine has been greatly exaggerated"
reported the Daily Express in November 1921, The dispute rumbled on with the paper questioning Save the Children's motives, finances and efficiency, while running headlines emphasising domestic need, such as "Folly of Feeding Russia", "Huge Sums for a Dubious Famine: What of England?" and "Moment Ill-Chosen to Appeal for Funds: Needs at Home".
As tensions grew Save the Children flag-sellers were threatened with being thrown into the Thames, and groups of unemployed men demonstrated in the street outside the Fund's office.Eglantyne's brilliant response was to send a well-known press photographer, George Mewes from the Daily Mirror, to film first the famine conditions, and later the Fund's feeding centres in operation. Mewes reported:
"Often I saw children who had gone far beyond the stage where English food and medicine would help, children in such a condition, that had they been animals, one would have destroyed them where they lay."